Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-2600 - 199 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $54.95 vs $265.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900K - $0.35 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
26.31578947368421%
Price, $
$265
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361881 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
155
77.88944723618091%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $54.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361880 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
612
25.81189371573176%
Multi-Core
2054
18.76141761052247%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |