Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-2600K - 144 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $70.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-11900K - $0.54 vs $1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
29.347826086956523%
Price, $
$265
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349336 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
129
89.58333333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
28.173766343315055%
Multi-Core
2320
21.191085129704053%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |