Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K and the cheaper Core i9-11900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900F - 683 vs 657 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $240.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900K - $0.37 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
683
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
94.87179487179486%
Price, $
$265
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350854 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
96.19326500732065%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350854 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
2171
91.56474061577393%
Multi-Core
9171
83.76872488125684%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |