Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Alan Wake 2 than Pentium G630 - 128 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $37.49 vs $265.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-11900K - $0.39 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
18.84057971014493%
Price, $
$265
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362090 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
97
75.78125%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362090 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |