Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 133% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-3240 - 235 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $41.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-11900K - $0.41 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
36.283185840707965%
Price, $
$265
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362011 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
101
42.97872340425532%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
23.3656684943062%
Multi-Core
1137
10.385458531238582%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |