Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1820 - 197 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $46.41 vs $240.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900KF - $0.31 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
25.40983606557377%
Price, $
$240
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361995 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
152
77.15736040609137%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361994 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
21.191195511437204%
Multi-Core
825
8.148148148148149%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |