Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4150 - 197 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $48.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900KF - $0.29 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
23.770491803278688%
Price, $
$240
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362003 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
165
83.75634517766497%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
44.92878722485973%
Multi-Core
2047
20.217283950617286%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |