Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 93% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3450 - 492 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $69.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900KF - $0.27 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
492
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
55.102040816326536%
Price, $
$240
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361160 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
255
51.829268292682926%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
26.025032369443245%
Multi-Core
1781
17.590123456790124%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |