Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1092 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-9400F - 145 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $112.0 vs $458.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-12900 - $0.83 vs $3.16 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
26.265822784810123%
Price, $
$458
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348737 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
135
93.10344827586206%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348737 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
55.72179539021431%
Multi-Core
4834
37.05918429929469%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |