Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-2500K - 136 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $390.81 vs $567.98
- Up to 17% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900 - $3.46 vs $4.18 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.18/FPS
82.77511961722489%
Price, $
$567.98
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349160 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
113
83.08823529411765%
Value, $/FPS
$3.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$390.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
23.80250552689757%
Multi-Core
1921
11.694873980275174%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |