Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2068 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-5930K - 193 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $244.77 vs $549.95
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-5930K - $1.27 vs $3.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5930K - 20 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348667 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
182
94.30051813471503%
Value, $/FPS
$3.02/FPS
42.05298013245033%
Price, $
$549.95
44%
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1156
68.97374701670644%
Multi-Core
5480
65.03679088535486%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |