Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 397 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Athlon 3000G - 295 vs 284 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $63.83 vs $595.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-9920X - $0.22 vs $2.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
295
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
10.891089108910892%
Price, $
$595
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349815 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
284
96.27118644067797%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
67.72823779193206%
Multi-Core
1975
20.91717856386359%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |