Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1956 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-9590 - 159 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 165 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $298.02 vs $595.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-9920X - $1.99 vs $3.74 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.74/FPS
53.20855614973262%
Price, $
$595
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350787 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
150
94.33962264150944%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350786 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |