Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 559 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-9920X - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $225.99 vs $595.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-9920X - $1.67 vs $4.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
132
97.77777777777777%
Value, $/FPS
$4.51/FPS
37.028824833702885%
Price, $
$595
37%
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349759 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349759 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |