Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980XE outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9980XE is 1999 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980XE
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than FX-6350 - 241 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 36 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-9980XE - $100.0 vs $1067.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-9980XE - $0.48 vs $4.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9980XE - 125 vs 165 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
241
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.43/FPS
10.835214446952596%
Price, $
$1067
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,067 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349461 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
209
86.72199170124482%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9980XE | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 6 |
36 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |