Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980XE outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9980XE is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980XE
- Performs up to 36% better in War Thunder than FX-8350 - 180 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 36 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9980XE - $185.0 vs $1067.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-9980XE - $1.4 vs $5.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9980XE - 125 vs 165 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.93/FPS
23.608768971332207%
Price, $
$1067
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,067 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352190 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
132
73.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9980XE | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 8 |
36 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |