Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1336 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than FX-8350 - 523 vs 505 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than FX-8350 - $148.95 vs $185.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing World of Tanks than FX-8350 - $0.28 vs $0.37 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
523
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $148.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359814 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
505
96.5583173996176%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
75.67567567567568%
Price, $
$185
80%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |