Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14500 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14500 is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14500
- Performs up to 38% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1620 - 128 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-14500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |