Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1620 - 153 vs 117 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |