Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 5397 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 16% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon W3520 - 344 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
