Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon w5-3425 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 316 days older than Xeon w5-3425.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 15% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon w5-3425 - 157 vs 137 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w5-3425 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon w5-3425 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 150 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |