Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 7100 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 2162 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Performs up to 67% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Arc A310 - 10 vs 6 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 49% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 7100 - $99.99 vs $197.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 7100 - $16.66 vs $19.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 - 30 vs 130 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
FPS
10
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.8/FPS
84.14141414141415%
Price, $
$197.99
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $197.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311737 minutes ago
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
70.38712921065861%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
31.28491620111732%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Alchemist |
$799 | MSRP | Not Available |
4x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
1188 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1243 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |