Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3450 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $128.04 vs $169.21
- Up to 18% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen 7 5700X - $0.66 vs $0.8 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 8% better in The Outer Worlds than FX-6300 - 211 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
195
92.41706161137441%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358113 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
82.5%
Price, $
$169.21
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $169.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |