Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $128.04 vs $143.72
- Up to 3% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10600K - $0.86 vs $0.89 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6300 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
149
92.54658385093167%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354090 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
96.62921348314606%
Price, $
$143.72
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354090 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |