Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $128.04 vs $140.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-8400 - $0.67 vs $0.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6300 - 204 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
93.13725490196079%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354117 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
97.10144927536233%
Price, $
$140
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |