Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $128.04 vs $147.99
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 15% better in God of War than FX-6300 - 187 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
163
87.16577540106952%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354125 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$147.99
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |