Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $128.04 vs $445.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.98 vs $2.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 50% better in War Thunder than FX-6300 - 197 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
131
66.49746192893402%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348608 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.26/FPS
43.36283185840708%
Price, $
$445
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $445 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348608 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |