Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $128.04 vs $531.86
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 343% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6300 - 102 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-6300 - $5.21 vs $5.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 32 vs 6 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
23
22.54901960784314%
Value, $/FPS
$5.57/FPS
93.53680430879712%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348329 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$531.86
24%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |