Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $128.04 vs $545.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-9800X - $0.98 vs $3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 35% better in War Thunder than FX-6300 - 177 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
131
74.01129943502825%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348734 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
31.818181818181817%
Price, $
$545
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |