Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $128.04 vs $490.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900K - $0.98 vs $2.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 53% better in War Thunder than FX-6300 - 201 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
131
65.17412935323384%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348734 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
40.16393442622951%
Price, $
$490
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |