Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 565 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than FX-8120 - 235 vs 233 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 22% cheaper than FX-6350 - $78.02 vs $100.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-6350 - $0.33 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
76.74418604651163%
Price, $
$100
78%
FPS Winner
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361145 minutes ago
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
99.14893617021276%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 95W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
