Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 2396 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 36% cheaper than FX-6350 - $63.83 vs $100.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-6350 - $0.34 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361169 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |