Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1816 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $100.0 vs $155.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.82 vs $1.15 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 11% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-6350 - 135 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
122
90.37037037037037%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349342 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
71.30434782608695%
Price, $
$155
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |