Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $100.0 vs $153.0
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 61% better in Starfield than FX-6350 - 71 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Starfield than FX-6350 - $2.15 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
44
61.97183098591549%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
94.7136563876652%
Price, $
$100
100%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349333 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$153
65%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $153 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |