Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690K is 399 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-6350 - 111 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-6350 - $53.5 vs $100.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than FX-6350 - $0.48 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 88 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
99
89.1891891891892%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
47.524752475247524%
Price, $
$100
53%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361146 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
111
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $53.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 88 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |