Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $100.0 vs $372.84
- Up to 61% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-9900 - $0.76 vs $1.94 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 45% better in War Thunder than FX-6350 - 192 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
39.175257731958766%
Price, $
$372.84
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $372.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |