Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 600 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 177 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $109.99 vs $372.84
- Up to 70% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-9900 - $0.64 vs $2.11 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
30.33175355450237%
Price, $
$372.84
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $372.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349227 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
96.61016949152543%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
72.50155183116077%
Multi-Core
5794
80.42754025541366%
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |