Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 565 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 22% cheaper than FX-6350 - $78.02 vs $100.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-6350 - $1.44 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 11% better in League of Legends than FX-8120 - 60 vs 54 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361221 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
86.22754491017965%
Price, $
$100
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |