Buy on Amazon
$47.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-8300 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-8300 is 611 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2100.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-2100 - $47.98 vs $49.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-2100 - $2.09 vs $2.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3.3 GHz Eight-Core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W FX-8300 Bulk Package
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354192 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-2100 Dual-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I32100
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
