Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670S is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $47.98 vs $55.26
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than FX-8300 - 184 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Rust than FX-8300 - $0.3 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280640 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
86%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280641 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |