Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 313 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8300 - 230 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than FX-8300 - $43.0 vs $47.98
- Up to 14% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8300 - $0.19 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280649 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280650 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |