Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2405S outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2405S is 520 days older than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8300 - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-8300 - $46.0 vs $47.98
- Up to 4% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8300 - $0.24 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280635 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |