Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770S outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4770S is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-4770S - $102.02 vs $119.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-4770S - $0.65 vs $0.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770S
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8320 - 170 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
157
92.3529411764706%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354062 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
92.85714285714288%
Price, $
$119
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770S |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |