Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $102.02 vs $110.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.73 vs $0.76 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 5% better in Metro Exodus than FX-8320 - 146 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280480 minutes ago
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280480 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |