Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1336 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-8320 - 169 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than FX-8320 - $94.05 vs $102.02
- Up to 11% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than FX-8320 - $0.56 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280466 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280467 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |