Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $102.02 vs $115.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i3-9100F - $0.7 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Saints Row than FX-8320 - 161 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280459 minutes ago
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |