Buy on Amazon
$102.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $64
Availability
MSRP in USD: $64
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G5400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G5400 is 1987 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Performs up to 3% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8320 - 162 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-8320 - $50.0 vs $102.02
- Up to 52% better value when playing No Man's Sky than FX-8320 - $0.31 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
157
96.91358024691358%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
47.692307692307686%
Price, $
$102.02
49%
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360841 minutes ago
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Pentium® Gold G5400 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.7GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W/58W BX80684G5400
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360840 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
