Buy on Amazon
$102.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3250 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3250 is 636 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8320 - 458 vs 445 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than FX-8320 - $61.0 vs $102.02
- Up to 43% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8320 - $0.13 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
445
97.16157205240175%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
56.52173913043478%
Price, $
$102.02
59%
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361056 minutes ago
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
458
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium Processor G3250 (3.20 GHz 32 GB, FCLGA1.150) BX80646G3250
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
