Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 313 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 70% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320 - 39 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than FX-8320 - $43.0 vs $102.02
- Up to 75% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320 - $1.1 vs $4.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
23
58.97435897435898%
Value, $/FPS
$4.44/FPS
24.774774774774773%
Price, $
$102.02
42%
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361064 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
39
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |