Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4570S outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4570S is 222 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570S
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320 - 126 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than FX-8320 - $59.57 vs $102.02
- Up to 45% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320 - $0.47 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
93.65079365079364%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
54.65116279069767%
Price, $
$102.02
58%
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360832 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360833 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-4570S |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |